Blog

Back to making stuff

I have had a pretty frustrating second half of 2020 because not only have we had the covid problem, but I managed to get carpel tunnel injury to my right hand, so much so that I was basically unable to do anything with my hand – putting my building projects on hold. Not that I had any very important projects, but like to putter around and am attempting to make a studio space within our barn/shop for my wife to work. She needs, and deserves, a nice space with good light and temperature controls.

After several visits to me GP doctor I finally got an appointment with a hand specialist. His opinion was that I had waited too long before seeking treatment, resulting in severe permanent damage to the nerves in my hand. His opinion was that prompt treatment via a “small” operation could save the use of my hand, but most likely not the sense of touch. That “little” operation was extremely painful, and is taking a long time to heal. I have been unable to do anything that requires “force” for about three months – effectively putting all “puttering around the house” projects on hold. About a six weeks ago I noticed that the numbness in my fingers was slowly changing for the better. Starting with the palm of my hand, the “un-numb” parts started moving toward my finger tips at the rate of about 1/2 inch per week. It is now to the tip of my fingers, perhaps next week it will be numb free. Apparently I was one of the lucky ones and the feeling of my fingers has returned. Now I can concentrate on the studio project.

This is really a pretty simple project consisting of a few studs, installing a door, and a few other minor tasks. It will be sheetrocked and include a storage ledge. Her new space will be the section to the right that is under a shed roof.

This small project has been in the works for several years because while it seems simple enough, there was a long list of things that needed doing first in order to get to this step. I think it is finally getting to the point where it will become real and she can finally have a place to do ceramics. Her big electric kiln will be just outside of a door. She obtained the kiln second hand about ten years ago, but so far it hasn’t been used. I set it up once, including wiring it and all that – but since there was no good place to do her work it just sat there right in the way in my shop space. I am not quite sure how this is going to work out since we just have the electric kiln, which is fine for bisque but she doesn’t high fire work that will require yet another kiln, or access to one somewhere else. (It takes two steps for high fire work. The first firing gets the clay “sort of hard” but it takes very high temperatures to get it to the melting point where the glaze and clay basically turn into glass.)

I am excited to see if my hand will actually hold up to the project. If not, perhaps it will be an Easter project.

Bicycle Ride

While this story is in many ways just another “close call” by a youth during the long summer vacation, it also illustrates the mind’s ability to “stop the world” and act using a vastly different point of view and time scale. This event was my first experience of the change in the flow of time that sometimes happens when we are in great danger, absolutely dependent upon our actions to save ourselves from great harm or death.

The summers in Sonoma California were times of high adventure for me as I was growing up.  I spent much of my time hiking in the hills (we called them “mountains”) between Sonoma and Boyes Hot Springs, swimming in one of the six public swimming pools within my “territory,” hanging out with friends, or riding my bicycle. 

One of my bicycle haunts was down by Sonoma Creek, about two miles from my home.  Next to the creek was a grove of oak trees in what must have been part of a park at one time.  The grove consisted of a couple of acres of flat land with trees that were either planted, or thinned out, to make nice shady picnic areas next to the creek.  The creek was normally almost dry during the summer months.  There were small ponds with warm water, green scum, and giant bullfrog polliwogs in between the large, rounded boulders lining its bed. 

At the end of the grove of trees there was a dirt road leading down to the creek bed.  The road angled steeply down for thirty feet or so, and then bent sharply to the right, going around an “island” of land that rose on all sides – creating a peaked hill about 15 feet tall.  At the top of the hill was a single oak tree spreading its shady limbs over the hill and part of the creek below.  The side of the hill facing the creek had been eroded into a vertical cliff falling away from the tree to the boulder-filled creek more than twenty feet below the peak of the hill.

I liked to visit this part of the creek because there were fish, frogs, pollywogs, crawdads and other creatures in the pools.  It was also a great access point for hikes up or down the creek.  During that summer, each time I visited on my bicycle I would ride down the first part of the dirt road and up the side of the island, hoping to make it all the way to the top.  I would get part way up, run out of speed and fall over – tumbling back down the hill.  I knew that if I went fast enough I could make it to the top, but since there was just barely enough room on the top to park the bike before going over the cliff I had to be careful to judge my speed to avoid that possibility. Every time I tried it I would go a little faster and get a little higher up the hill before falling over and tumbling back down the hill.

One day I decided that it was time to get to the top. I started far back in the grove of trees and pedaled as fast as I could.  I was really going by the time I got to the road, bouncing around on the rough dirt road.  I flew down the road, turned up the hill and didn’t slow down at all!  In a flash I was at the top of the hill, into the air, and still climbing. 

As I flew up into the air,   I felt that time almost stopped.  It was like I was suspended in time and space. I had all the time in the world to check out my new predicament. I looked down and saw that I was well past the edge of the cliff, headed upward in a nice gentle curve that had a trajectory leading me to the middle of the creek below – right into the place with the biggest and nastiest looking boulders.  I thought about stopping, but since I had long since left the ground it was obvious that wasn’t an option.  I let go of my bike, feeling like I was hanging almost motionless, and bike-less, in the air. 

On my right side I noticed a big limb of a tree reaching out over the creek, the limb was right next to me, parallel to my flight path.  I reached over and grabbed onto that limb. The next thing I knew I was swinging from the branch, watching my bicycle continue through its arc and then falling front wheel first onto the rocks right where I had predicted.  The bike bounced and then crashed with a resounding smashing sound, ending up in a scum covered pond with broken spokes and a bent frame.  I swung from the limb for a little bit imagining what it would have been like if that tree hadn’t reached out and caught me.  I think that might well have been the end of my adventures for that summer. I finally reached up with my legs, encircling the limb – holding on upside down.  I inched my way back to the trunk of the tree onto firm ground and went to rescue my bicycle.  It was a little bent, but still usable.  It was covered in long, green, pond scum.  After cleaning it up as best as could, I was back on the saddle, no harm done – thankful to that grand old tree that was just waiting there to catch a boy in its arms. 

Consilience – the unity of knowledge Edward O. Wilson

The Wall Street Journal had this to say about the book: “A dazzling journey across the sciences and humanities in search of deep laws to unite them.” This is a pretty good description of the book. Dr. Wilson’s main professional background was as a biology professor at Harvard, specializing in entomology. Wilson has been called “the father of sociobiology and “the father of biodivesity for his environmental advocacy. His book explores relationship between biology (as it has evolved through the process of natural selection) and theories of the mind, culture, human nature, the Social Sciences, art as well as ethics and religion.

I think his basic point is that we are animals that have evolved over millions of years to be compatible with a particular environment. This evolution has not only directly the obvious, outward characteristics of people such as the shape and placement of our arms and legs, but the way that our brain is constructed and “wired”. However, cellular evolution is a slow process occurring over hundreds of thousands of years. However, the social environment that we current inhabit is only a few thousand years old, meaning that while we have “instincts” built into our genes that have been tailored for fitness in one environment, there is a question concerning their “fitness” and utility in the current social environment. His idea is that in order to work the “best” our laws, morals, art, and all of those “social” things need to have consilience (be in agreement/alignment) with our biological roots. When they are, things work smoothly, when they are not – not so much.

I think this is all very interesting and “sounds correct” to me. However, it has stirred some thoughts in my mind about a need for consilience at a much larger scale than “merely” a match between our society and our biological being. My profession is as a “system safety engineer”. That means that I work as part of a team to develop processes, products and operations in such as way as to be effective, efficient, useful, and safe. everyone on the team is concerned about all of these things, but I focus my attention specifically on “safe.” One of the interesting aspects about “system safety” is that there are very few specific criteria about what that means, it is an open question that hinges around the concept of “safe enough”.

One of the first questions that comes to mind with considering what “safe enough” means, is safe enough for what, or safe enough for whom? For the designer? For the company creating a new widget? For the purchaser? For the user? For the maintenance person? For the general public? For the environment? It is clear that there is no one point of view for deciding if it is “safe enough” – that all depends upon the point of view. In some mysterious way, being safe enough means that it has been judged to have benefits that outweigh the costs. In this sense the “costs” are not just in terms of dollars, or perhaps schedule – it is in terms of everything that we, as humans, consider “costly” including many things that cannot be monetized. Determining whether or not a design is “acceptable” includes considerations of things such as “asthetics”, “view”, “noise”, “smell” “damaged environment” – the list is very long and in many cases include the defining component of the judgement of “safe enough”.

It might be thought that “safety” is only about things that can cut, crush, smash, burn or otherwise cause bodily injury to someone. I disagree with that point of view. I think “safety” includes things that negatively impact people’s “well being” and “mental health”. Perhaps these additional items come under the heading of “comfort” or free from pain/discomfort – including things like the loss of a treasured view. The concern with things like “global warming” and “sea level rise” are clearly in the realm of “safety” even though a design that adds to those kinds of global concerns might not immediately impact the safety of the user.

However you define “safety”, however narrow or broad you cast the net of safety concerns, there is always the same problem of determining what is “safe enough” from the point of view of multiple points of view. I think the idea of “consilience” applies nicely to solving this rather complex problem. I propose that if all of effected players are brought into the decision making process, and if they all know the potential impacts (positive and negative) from their point of view then it is “safe enough” when they all agree that it is so. If it is not “safe enough” for one or more of the points of view, then it is not safe enough. Period. Full stop. There needs to be consilience or it isn’t acceptable, and that will often come back to be shown to be true in all types of ways, not the least are future litigation, loss of market share, disgruntled employees, high accident rates or otherwise.

The point is that not only designs be “consilient” with how people are (human factors), they also have to align with all of the sciences, company needs, financial concerns while accomplishing what it is that was the purpose of the project. System Safety has been defined as the application of engineering and management principles, criteria, and techniques to achieve acceptable risk within the constraints of operational effectiveness and suitability, time, and cost throughout all phases of the system life-cycle. I am of the opinion that this points to a much larger definition that includes not just “engineering” (including environmental engineering) but “science” (including the life sciences), and “cost” in the broad sense that includes all negative impacts.

System safety is the “big” picture view, seeking consilience with the various scientific domains, but also the environment and the needs of humanity (individually as well as globally).

Ghosts

When I was growing up there were family stories and jokes about our “family” ghost, Mr. Brown.  He was mentioned in passing, half in jest, whenever something was out of place, or if someone heard an unexplained noise.   I was never quite sure if these explanations were meant to be true, or if they were just little jokes.  I am still not sure about that, even in my own mind. 

For the first year of my life, we lived in a little old farmhouse in Novato, California.  The building had been built by my mother’s family and was located on a family farm not far from town.  At some time prior to our moving in, the house had been used as the local post office.  According to our family story one day a dead man, Mr. Brown, was found floating in the water trough in front of the post office.  Mr. Brown had come to a violent end, either being drowned or possibly murdered and then thrown into the trough.  In any case, he ended up dead in the front yard of the building.  The murderer was never caught.  After Mr. Brown’s death, stories were told around town that the house had become haunted by his ghost.  Apparently, those stories did not stop my parents from purchasing the house and associated ranch for their new family.

When I was about one year old, my folks sold the ranch in Marin County and we moved to the small town of Sierra City in the gold country of the Sierra Nevada Mountains.  At that time, Sierra City was a real old-time mining town – complete with the 85 year old lady, Myrtle, who would sit on the front porch of the grocery store telling stories of the old days when the gold rush was on.  She kept a loaded 45 caliber revolver nearby for protection. 

We lived in an apartment over the grocery store, next to the fire bell that was mounted on two tall poles.  The fire bell had a pair of ropes hanging down with “D” handles that were used to ring the alarm when needed.  Those ropes were just right to make a swing for us kids, which was okay as long as we were very careful not to pull harder on one rope than the other, because that would cause the bell to ring.  This created a “false alarm” and was definitely frowned upon by the adults of the town.  My folks ran a small dry goods store that shared a building with the post office.  In the winter months, they ran a rope-tow ski slope that featured an extremely steep and short slope that ended abruptly at the banks of the Yuba River.  You had to be a good skier to avoid going into the icy river at the bottom of the hill. In his free time during summer months my father was a carpenter.  This was a wonderful little town for a young child.  During this time, whenever something odd would happen, such as an unexplained noise, or a door shutting by itself, it was explained as being the works of Mr. Brown.  When I was very little, this made sense to me and I believed that he was nearby.  I just assumed that there was a friendly ghost hanging around most of the time.

We moved to the town of Sonoma when I was almost five years old.   Apparently the ghost moved with us, because my parents kept talking about Mr. Brown doing things.  They explained that he seemed to like our family and had moved along with us.  This was a pretty easy way to account for the many odd little things that happened, always half joking and half-serious.  I think my folks almost believed in their story of Mr. Brown.

Every Christmas we had a bell-shaped music box that would play a Christmas song if you pulled down a string hanging from the bottom.  It was kind of fun to pull the string down now and then to get a little Christmas cheer.  One year a few days before Christmas my father was sitting by the fire reading a book around 5:00 o’clock when the Christmas bell chime went through its song without being started.  That was the first evidence that I am aware of “Mr. Brown” doing anything more than opening and closing doors, moving papers around, and other things that could easily be explained away as the wind and the actions of children.  I didn’t really believe in Mr. Brown, but I kind of liked the idea of having a friendly ghost around the place.  It can be fun to have an imaginary friend.

A few years after the Christmas bell incident, I saw Mr. Brown one evening in my father’s shop.  I was about ten or twelve years old at the time, and was working on a project in my father’s garage shop.  It was early in the evening, not quite dark, when I “felt” a presence with me in the room.  At first I thought it was my older brother, father or perhaps a friend – but when I looked up from my work, I was alone.  I decided that I was just imagining things, so I went back to working on my project.  Then I felt really weird and the hair on the back of my neck rose.  I was really feeling something this time.  I looked up again, and there was a person standing in front of me, floating a foot or so above the floor.  It was a thin man, in his early thirties or so, standing in front of the workbench watching me work.  He didn’t make any large moves, or acknowledge my noticing him, he just seemed to watching me work.  However he wasn’t a normal man, he wasn’t solid – I could see though him.  He was more like what I would now image a hologram to look like.  Very clear, easy to see, but obviously just made of light, not made of a solid substance.   We stood watching each other; I was transfixed by seeing Mr. Brown for the first time.  After a few minutes of this I decided that I should go get my brother and let him see the apparition.  I told “Mr. Brown” to stay where he was, I would be back in a minute and that I wanted to introduce him to my brother.  I went into the house to get my brother to come see this, but of course by the time we got back the ghostly man was gone. 

It seemed like he stayed around my family for quite some time after that, and always felt like a friendly, comfortable being to me.  I was never frightened of him or the idea of him.  I kept hoping for another chance to see him – but never did.  When we all moved out of the house and my parents sold the place he seemed to finally go away. For awhile it seemed that he had followed my brother and me to Arcata where we went to college, but then he just faded away.  I have not felt his presence for many years.  I kind of miss him. I liked having him around – looking after us from his secret place.

Do we have the “right”?

I can no longer sit quietly while people are screaming in the streets of Sacramento about their “right” to keep their businesses open in violation of the State’s health and safety laws and orders. This is perhaps the most inane demonstration that I have heard over a year of some pretty big doozies. Of course there is no “right” to keep a business open in violation of heath and safety orders. There is no more “right” to do this than there is to shot children in the playground, or drive your car on a freeway without a license, or pour poison in drinking water supplies, pour poisons into the air, or … the list is infinite because nobody has a right to do something endangers the health, safety and lives of others. If the State has determined that operating your business endangers the public (and it has so determined), then they have the right (and obligation) to prevent you from doing so.

You also don’t have the “right” to totally unfettered free speech. You can’t yell “fire” in a crowded theater because people die when that happens, you can’t say things to incite a riot because people die when that happens. While the first amendment says is: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” That does not mean that there is unlimited freedom to say whatever you want, it is that congress shall not make any laws abridging the freedom of speech. There are many, many cases where the courts have agreed to the concept that there are limits on freedom of speech, pretty much along the same lines as I outlined in the first paragraph. Your freedom of speech ends where it can, or does, cause damage or injury to others. In my mind, stirring up a lot of support for the idea of massive violations of the State’s health and safety laws with regard to the covid pandemic fit into the category of speech that has the potential for resulting in massive illness and death.

Christmas Eve

The sun is just setting on Christmas eve of an amazing year. Not necessarily a good year, but certainly amazing in so many ways. I wonder, and fear, what is coming next year – but today I am feeling some hope that this year will mark a turning point in humanity, a turning point where we begin to understand that we are not invincible, the world does not have infinite resources and we all need to hold hands and work together. This year I think all of us have made projections and assessments about the near future, only to find that we knew very little and the near future just comes – we can wish it not to be so, wish it would go away, wish what we want – but it still comes. Better to do what we can to help, do what we can to stay flexible, and do what we can to understand that we are all one family, and the earth is one living organism (sometimes referred to as Gaia). I am not so silly as to think that the world is literally only one organism, but it certainly is connected and has interactions that are so intertwined that it might as well be. It is all far more complex, and interdependent than we will ever be able to know. My opinion is we need to do what we can to maintain a gentle footprint, and try to not overdo any of the things that we do – moderation is definitely the order of the day.

So, I have hope that this coming year will be better in many important ways. Hopefully the pandemic will get tamped down so we can all see our friends and family again without fear and worry that we are putting each other at risk. Hopefully the government will do a slightly better job of helping the people that depend upon it in so many ways. Hopefully we will be a bit better at helping those that need help, or at least not harming those that are vulnerable. Maybe not so much offering help as to not smacking their fingers every time they start to get a handle on getting themselves into a better place.

Ho ho ho – may Christmas be loving, fun, fulfilling and safe. My biggest wish is that those of you who chose to gather with loved ones and friends don’t end up wishing you had made a different choice. May you all get what you need, and avoid what you don’t want. My suggestion is that if you are going to expose yourself and your loved ones to potentially great risks, do you very best to enjoy your time together. At least make it worthwhile.

With my love for the world, Merry Christmas

The Operation

This story is my first memory of having a really weird experience.  It is not only my first memory of such an experience, but remains by far the most powerful and awe inspiring of my life.  I am not sure of the year, but I believe that I was around five, or possibly six years old, which would make is somewhere around 1952 or 1953.  The anesthetic (probably ether) was administered by dropping a liquid onto a cloth face mask.

When I think back on this experience, I don’t just recall it – I experience it once more.  I sometimes think that I must have almost died during that operation.  My impression of the event was that I experienced the dissolution of my body and rejoining of my mind with the cosmos.  Recalling this event reminds me that we are only here for a moment of time, only a temporary combination of star dust that experiences life for a brief time, and then goes back to where it comes from.  As the bible says; “ashes to ashes and dust to dust.”  I learned that life is all a dream, but a dream of reality that is real. The reality is energy and light.

When I was a little boy of about five years old I had been having chronic throat problems diagnosed as tonsillitis.  My parents and doctor decided that I needed to have my tonsils removed.  The doctor and my mother assured me that it would be quick and simple and that I won’t feel a thing.  Being a young child, I believed them.  Not only was it supposed to be quick and easy, but I was told that I would be allowed to eat as much ice cream as I wanted after the surgery.

The big day finally came when I went to the hospital.  I was told to put on a silly gown with no back, and get into the hospital bed.  It was slightly scary, but since my mom was with me and she seemed completely at ease, I was more curious than frightened.  After a short wait a nurse wheeled me down the hall to the operating room.  I recall watching the lights and ceiling tiles go by overhead as the nurse pushed me along.  When we were finally in the operating room, I looked into a big bright light above the bed. The doctor put a cloth mask over my nose and mouth.  He said that he was going to help me go to sleep and that when I woke up the operation would be all finished. He then took a little liquid (ether) from a bottle with an eye dropper device.  He asked me to breathe deeply and count from one to ten as he put drops of the liquid on the mask.  I took a breath, counted “one” and thought that he wasn’t going to be successful because nothing seemed to change.  After “two” I noticed that I was getting a little dizzy.  By the middle of “three,” I was launched into the most amazing experience of my life. 

I found myself looking into a dark night sky, full of bright stars.  I was not on the earth, but was floating in space completely comfortable, warm and at ease.  Then the sky slowly started to slowly spin around a point directly above me like a giant pinwheel.  As it spun, the sky started to change shape, forming a tunnel leading away from me into the distance. It was a little like I would imagine if I were to look directly up into the bottom of a big, slow moving tornado. 

What was even more amazing was what was happening to my body.  It started by becoming fluid feeling, as if it were made out of something like a big bunch of silly putty.  I could feel my arms and legs growing, and twisting in ways that were clearly impossible.  As I twisted and lost shape, I started to move into the bottom of the spinning tunnel, being pulled further and further into it.  Faster and faster the tunnel walls turned, and faster and faster I shot up the center of the tunnel.  After a bit my body started feeling like it was not only twisting and distorting, but was starting to come apart – all of the connections were still in place, but no longer felt connected.  My face and body distorted until I was just a blob of energy and matter, no longer in the shape of my body.  The tunnel got narrower as I moved up, and turned faster until it was a rapidly spinning tornado of energy and lights, carrying my distorting body up through the center of the vortex.

I noticed that there was an end to the tunnel.  At the very far end of the twisting tunnel there was a tiny dark spot which was rapidly growing bigger and bigger as I got closer to it.  As I neared the end of the tunnel, I could see through the hole to …. nothing.  I was still thinking and perceiving clearly, and understood that once I shot though the end of the tunnel I would enter a place of nothingness; a complete and black void.  At first that frightened me because it was so unknown.  It was bad enough to be twisting, turning and distorting inside of a giant spinning tunnel, but to be in nothing was frightening.  It wasn’t terrifying, but certainly not something I was looking forward to.  I found myself picking up a huge amount of speed, approaching what felt like the speed of light and everything was flashing by as a blur. The tunnel was getting narrower, getting very close to my body as it whirled around me.  It was obvious that I was not going to avoid the transition at the end of the tunnel, and found myself being really curious about what was going to happen next.  I started to almost look forward to the event of entering into nothingness.

Then I shot through the hole, into the void.  As I crossed the boundary, my body exploded into trillions and trillions of tiny particles that flew off in all directions into the great void.  All went silent, time stopped; motion became fast and slow all at the same time because there was no “thing” such as time and distance to measure them by.  I was just floating as trillions of tiny pieces, but I was still thinking, somehow I still had my mind.  I could still perceive, and could still think, but I was just part of an infinite, timeless void.  I floated like this for what seemed like an eternity in complete peace and joy.

Then I heard a voice.  It was very far away and very quiet. The voice was calling my name over and over again, soft and lovely and attractive – pulling me toward it.  I finally realized that I was supposed to go to the voice, and slowly started forming my body again.  When I finally opened my eyes I was looking into my mother’s face.  She was gently calling my name.  She looked pleased to see me open my eyes, and said that it was all over and that I was okay.

As I lay there trying to complete the reformation of my body, I was thinking that they should have prepared me for this wild journey; they should have let me know what I was going to experience.  Of course, now that I look back on it, they had no idea what was going to happen to me.  Since then I have talked to many people who have been operated on using ether, and none of them experienced anything at all like my wild ride to infinity.  A while ago I was listening to a friend tell about a “near death” experience that he had and it seemed very similar.  This makes me wonder if maybe something went wrong during the operation and I died.  Maybe the experience was my death, and they managed to bring me back to life.  I don’t know. All that I know is that it is my oldest recollection of an altered state of consciousness.

Whatever it was, it was by far the most dramatic and most enduring experience of my spiritual life.  I felt like I joined with the infinity, sometimes I still feel I never really came all the way back. The experience changed me forever in many good ways.  I feel like I am sort of half way between worlds, one foot in the infinite, and one on this earth.  And by the way, I really didn’t want the ice cream after all, I wanted steak instead.

Introduction – Memorable Experiences

I refer to the experiences described in these pages as “experiences” rather than “events” not so much because they weren’t events, but rather because I have no independent “proof” that they actually occurred, or occurred as I describe them.  All that I can honestly report are the memories, which I have attempted to describe without embellishment or explanation.  I have attempted to stay within the guidelines of Dragnet’s Sgt. Joe Friday, “All we want are the facts, ma’am.”   I am attempting to merely report, not interpret or otherwise assign any “higher” meaning to the experiences.  Of course, in the still of the night I sometimes wonder if there is something behind these experiences, some “secret” that I can use in my life.  (However, I have no knowledge of any hidden meaning, or hidden reality.  All that I have are the memories.)  

After telling a friend one of these stories, he wanted to know when these experiences started.  As I think back in attempting to answer his question, I find that maybe there was no starting point – they have been a part of my life from my earliest memories.  My first “memory” is of the moment of birth as a very physical feeling of pressure, squeezing, and my nose being smashed flat against my face.  Sometimes when calmly resting or meditating I recall the feelings of that early experience.  The memory takes the form of physical feelings of pressure and movement.   

A brief history of my life might be useful to help you understand some of what might have formed my current outlook, and might have been instrumental in my taking note of the experiences described in this book as something worth remembering.

As a very young child I remember having “invisible” friends.  While they were invisible, nevertheless they were real to me.  We talked, laughed and played together.  My mother tolerated them until I reached school age – at which point she took me aside and told me that while these friends might be fun to play with, they weren’t actually “real” and I had to stop playing with them, and had to stop believing in them.  She told me that she knew what I was doing because she did the same as a young child, but that it just doesn’t work with other people who don’t understand.  I remember that it was a very sad day for me because on that day as I agreed to let them go, it felt like moving away from my best friends.  Even though I agreed with her that I would stop talking and playing with them, I silently promised them that I would not forget them or make them go away. 

After that day I didn’t interact with these friends.  However, I think I was always a little different from most of my peers.  For example, when in the third grade other kids would play ball and other games during recess, I liked to go into an area near the playground where the grass was tall and I was hidden.  In the springtime I loved to lie back on the sweet, soft grass and watch the clouds drift overhead.  There were almost always one or two friends who would join me as we watched all kinds of animals and other things in the clouds.  If there were no clouds, I would lie on my stomach and watch the tiny, brightly colored flowers and all of the little bugs crawling through their miniature forest.  I didn’t feel anti-social in any way, just not interested in many of the normal “kid’s” games.  During summer months I would gather up a friend or two and we would hike all day in the forest and hills near my home.  We would start out right after breakfast  with my dog, CaseC (we got him at the pound, and he was in Case C), and roam for miles and miles exploring and imagining what it must have been like hundreds of years ago.  My mother never questioned where we were going, or what we were doing.  The only rule was to get home before dark.  I started doing this when I was about nine, and kept it up through most of high school years.

When I was around fifteen years old it seemed like my invisible friends were back once again.  They were still invisible, and they never actually spoke to me – but I “felt” them as a presence.  They make me feel like I am never truly alone; I am always in the presence of friends.

During high school I was a bit of a “problem child.”  I was on the “college prep” track, but was not allowed to attend a lot of the classes.  I think I was too disruptive, and there was no other place to put kids like me.  In those days there were no “special” classes or avenues for those of us who were too interested in the subject matter.  I was “kicked out” of Biology class by being sent to the creek behind the school to collect euglenas.  The teacher said I should be able to spot them by eye, but since they are less than a 1/100 of an inch long, that was unlikely.  I should have researched the issue to figure out actually how to catch those little guys, but the truth was that I was happy to be spending time on the banks of the creek.  It kept me out of the classroom for most of the year, and I had a great time hanging out in “my” creek.  I still had to do the homework, and had to attend class for labs and tests – but the rest of the time during the biology class I was free to explore and observe in my little wild part of the campus.  I also got kicked out of Chemistry class with two other boys.  We had to spend the lecture time in the lab, which wasn’t a very safe option for the three most inquisitive boys in the class.  I think it was sheer luck that we didn’t blow up the lab, burn the building down, or poison ourselves.   For example, one morning one of the brighter boys in school and I were fooling in the lab during lecture time.  We were “testing” a rather large electrolytic capacitor with a power supply, charging and discharging the capacitor to see how it worked.  I am not sure exactly what caused the explosion, but the capacitor blew up with the sound of so much dynamite, throwing the pieces of the metal case and the inner parts throughout the lab space.  We were startled, but luckily not hurt.  The teacher opened the door to the lecture room to and asked what had happened, then closed the door without a word – acting as if nothing had happened!

Another class from which I was barred was an English class.  I had to spend the entire year in a room across from the normal classroom.  Luckily, after a couple of months of “solitary confinement” two very nice girls were sent to join me.  We wrote stories and poems and generally had a good time.  Before long, I convinced them to help me create a campus literary magazine that featured stories, poems and other writings by students from around campus.  We got permission to use the mimeograph machine to publish it.  That magazine continued for a few years after we graduated, but finally faded away.

After graduating from high school I found that I had a choice of going to war in Vietnam, or going to college.  I chose college.  However, I discovered a major problem when signing up for school.  They wanted me to declare a major, and I had no clue what that might be.  I finally decided to go through the college catalogue and mark out those areas that I felt I couldn’t do for one reason or another.  It took me several days to work my way down through the list, finally coming to the point where there was only one unmarked major – physics!   So I declared that as my major.  This was a much bigger decision than I understood at the time.  For one thing, physics is HARD – very hard.  The old stuff (Newtonian Physics) was pretty easy since it was all about falling apples, levers, rolling balls, rocket ships, flying bullets and things like that.  However, once past those very tangible topics it got really weird really fast.  All of a sudden I found that questions of infinity, the origin of the universe, quarks, leptons, energy fields, variable time, variable mass and all kinds of wacky concepts were the topics of study.  It was all about the tiny, the huge, the invisible, waves, entities that are waves and particles simultaneously and much, much more.  I found it almost impossible to concentrate on the topics because I was so enraptured with the ideas of how very different the universe and all things in it are than what we think they are.  Obviously, reality was nothing like what I experienced, or what I had come to believe in.  At one point a professor told me that I needed to stop trying to understand it all and to just “do the math.”  Even math had become such a terribly abstract thing that I couldn’t figure out how to do it any longer.  By the time I was finishing up my senior year I was lost and could find nothing to hang on to.  Luckily, I realized that I had already taken enough classes to graduate, so I did – without finishing the last class that was offered (advanced quantum mechanics).  Education in physics had a profound impact on my “spiritual” view of the world – it shook it down to the point where there was no longer any ground to stand on.  I came to believe that there is not only nothing but tiny particles and energy, but there actually aren’t any tiny particles either – it is ALL just energy!  What we think we know is just in our mind, we actually “know” nothing at all. 

While immersed in physics and math (the language of physics), I also had to take all of the requisite “general education” courses.  One of my big concerns was the requirement for taking a speech class.  The idea of writing a speech and then presenting it was rather terrifying.   Luckily, about that time the school hired a “speech guru” who was a great presenter.  He was one of those people who can stand in front of a crowd and rally their support for just about any cause.  I guess the word for this attribute is “charismatic.” The women all were in love with him, the men respected him and didn’t even seem to mind their women hanging all over him, and the university seemed to think that he spoke for them.  This was during the time of the Vietnam War protests, which gave him a natural topic and audience.   One day I noticed that he was teaching a class in “interpersonal communications” that met the “speech” requirement, and didn’t involve writing or presenting speeches.  All that was required was talking to people!  I signed up immediately, greatly relieved that I didn’t have to stand in front of a group to give a presentation.

Actually, it was a bit more complex than just talking to people – it was really a lot more about listening to people.  The class included a wide range of topics including verbal and non-verbal communication issues.  I found this to be a very exciting class because it clarified and made explicit topics that I only knew about from my “intuitive” knowledge.  Not only did I get an “A” in the class, but the professor hired me to help with future classes as his classroom assistant.  During this time I discovered that being charismatic is something that can be learned – there are techniques and “tricks” to get people to believe and get emotionally involved with your point of view.    He showed me many of these tricks, and gave me an opportunity to try them out.  They work!

The field of interpersonal communication caught my attention, and started me down a path of psychology with the idea of becoming a therapist.  This was during the hay day of “encounter groups.”  This approach seems to have fallen out of favor, but in general it consists of a group of individuals who engage in intensive verbal and nonverbal interaction, with the general intention of increasing awareness of self and sensitivity to others, and improving interpersonal skills.   I attended many of these sessions more as an assistant leader than as a member of the group.  However, because of the nature of the technique, I found it impossible to avoid becoming engaged at a pretty deep level.  Over time I became skilled at leading these groups, and was recognized as a person who could be helpful to others.  I thought I was on my way to becoming a healing therapist.

However, after a time I started to realize that it was all about ego, my ego and the egos of the leaders and teachers.  We were manipulating people’s emotions, self-images, and feelings of self-worth.  That isn’t necessarily a bad thing, as long as it is done in a caring and helpful way – but it became rather overwhelming to me.  I found that I could use techniques to get people to like me, respect me, and in some cases think that they loved me.  I found that I could use techniques to help people feel good or bad about themselves.   I could adjust their self-image and feelings of worthiness (for good, or not so good).  I started to discover that some people had come to depend upon me to keep them feeling good – and if I wasn’t available they felt lost or sunk into depression.  I found this to be most perplexing and quite scary because I had no intention of manipulating anyone or of wanting anyone to become dependent upon me.  I was faced with two choices – to learn how to do all of this in a way that was somehow directed and owned by those in need, or get out of the field.  I got out.  I dropped all ties with the groups, with the psychology department, with the communications classes – everything.   I went back to my world of science, technology and mathematics.  

At about the time that I first encountered the interpersonal communications professor, I also encountered two other influences that were to remain as central features of my life. The first was meditation.   I attended a lot of talks by traveling gurus, listening to a wide range of metaphysical discussions until I found a simple technique called Transcendental Meditation (TM), which gave me a tool to help learn about my own mind.  I have used this meditation technique or variations on the same, for almost fifty years – sitting in meditation virtually every day of my adult life. The second was a series of books by Carlos Castaneda concerning some very weird experiences that he claims to have had with a Yaqui sorcerer, both with and without the assistance of “power plants.”  

I decided to try to duplicate the experiences that Castaneda described, but without using the plants.  It is much easier to have a “vision” with hallucinogenic substances than it is without their assistance.   However, then the visions seem to be “false” in some important way.  Instead of using hallucinogenic substances to achieve visions, I have attempted to learn how to quiet my mind and “observe” what is happening in the hopes of catching glimpses of another “reality.”  Many of the stories in this book are the results of these attempts. (I recently found out that Castaneda only used the power plants during the initial phase of his apprenticeship to don Juan.  He quickly stopped using them because they were too disruptive and not necessary.)

These practices have resulted in my learning to pay much closer attention to my mind, and to events happening in the world around me.  I spent many years perfecting the practice of being “an observer” – observing the world and myself without judgment or interpretation. 

When I was about 45 years old I came across a group of “sorcerers” from the same tradition as Castaneda’s Yaqui friends, which is actually a continuation of Toltec traditions.  The leader of this group is Miguel Ruiz, a practitioner and teacher of an ancient Toltec spiritual path.  I discovered that one of Ruiz’s students lived near my home, and decided to do whatever I could to learn from him.  At first I was unsure of this teacher, but decided to commit one year to doing whatever was suggested and see what would come of it.  That was more than twenty years ago, and I am still at it because it was far more powerful than I could possibly have imagined.  Many of the stories that are in this book come directly from my encounters with this teacher, a wonderful group of like-minded fellow travelers who live close to my home,  other “Toltec” practitioners  in Northern California, and don Miguel Ruiz and his party of apprentices and teachers from around the world. 

All of this has left me with a rather unique view of the world.  I am a scientist and engineer, I am a Buddhist meditator, and I am a dedicated practitioner of an ancient verbal tradition arising near modern day Mexico City.  These practices have all joined to allow me to simultaneously suspend dis-belief in what I experience, and to know that everything that I experience is internal – there is no “there” there.  That doesn’t mean that there isn’t a reality – obviously there is.  However, I know that I am picking and choosing what I see, what it means, and how it affects me.  As Ruiz says, I see everything as if in a smoky mirror.  The image that I see is me. The stories in this book are examples of what we can see, and what we can experience, if we learn to stop blocking things out.  If we just relax and observe what is “out there” and “in here” – our world automatically opens to a vastly different and more interesting place.  If we stop judging, we can start loving.  If we stop making assumptions, we start seeing.  If we stop forcing our view upon the world, we can start seeing the world. As the Buddhist nun Pema Chödrön teaches, there is no such thing as a true story.  I don’t know if my experiences described in this book are “true” in some fundamental way, or not.  Maybe it doesn’t matter.  Maybe there is no way to know because our lives are a mixture of the real and unreal – all day, every day.

Stick and Rudder by Wolfgang Langewiesche

Stick and Rudder is a book describing the art of flying, published in 1944. I have no intention of learning to fly, but was once again drawn to the book because of it’s interesting explanations of what keeps an airplane in the sky. The author’s opinion is that “angle of attack” is the key element in producing lift on a wing. Basically this means that air hitting the bottom surface of a wing “pushes” it up. This is in direct contradiction to the aeronautical engineers story that high wind speed above the wing creates a vacuum that “pulls” the wing up. This is supposedly caused by Bernoulli’s principle which states that as flow velocity increases in a fluid, the pressure drops. This applies on a wing where the air flow over the top is faster than on the bottom, resulting in a lower pressure on top, “pulling” the wing up.

The problem is that there is nothing to pull – things to not move toward regions of lower pressure because they are “pulled”, they move because they “pushed” by the region of higher pressure. The universe does no “suck” but it does “push.” The logic behind this is related to the fact that particles in a fluid generally do not have any connection between themselves, therefore they can’t pull on each other. The don’t act like a chain where all of the links are attached to each other, allowing the chain to be pulled. It is more like a line of individual blocks where if you pull the first one you get the first one, not all of them. However, if you push on the end one, the entire line of blocks moves.

It turns out that the forces created by the angle of attack are exactly the same magnitude and direction as calculated by using Burnoulli’s principle, so in fact the aeronautical engineers are not “wrong” but perhaps they aren’t “right” either. The difference is not about how you design a wing or airplane, but it does make a difference in how you fly it. Not an actual difference, but a vastly different “mental model” of what is going on. It is my contention that an important element in operating high speed machinery safely is having a correct mental model of what is happening so that when things are not happening as expected there is an enhanced opportunity to quickly, and accurately, take unplanned steps to get out of trouble (or better yet, avoid getting into trouble). Perhaps there is something about these two models that make one superior to the other in the mind of the pilot. A recent problem with the Boeing 737 Max crashing during takeoff was in a large measure due to unexpected behavior of the flight control system, and the pilot’s mental model not matching what was actually happening. The crashes almost certainly could have been avoided in the pilots had a better/clearer understanding of what was happening to the lift on the wings given the flight conditions.

Besides the idea of lift being created by increased pressure created by the angle of attack of the wings, I came upon a couple of other interesting ideas that were new to me until I thought them through. One idea that the author presented is that the thing that causes an airplane to go up or down is not the “elevators”, but rather the throttle. If you speed up, the plane will go up, if you slow down, it will go down. If you stay the same, it will stay the same. Somehow I had the idea that pulling the “stick” back, thus pointing the nose higher into the sky, caused the plane to go up. Actually, it causes the lift to decrease because the increased angle of attack slows the plane down, so the lift is less and the plane goes down (depending upon various characteristics of the plane). The thing that adjusts the speed of the plane is the stick, but adjusting the angle of attack and hence the “friction” on the wings. Pull back on the stick and you slow down, push forward and you go faster. Increase throttle and you go up, decrease it and you go down. The ailerons can, and usually do, similarly unexpected things. Tip the plane to the left as if you want to turn to the left and it is likely to turn to the right (while tipped to the left). Spins, stalls, and all sorts of other highly undesirable outcomes can easily result from the disconnect between the pilot’s expectations based upon their mental model of what is happening, and what is actually happening.

In any case, I found the book to be an interesting study of what I thought I knew about flying and airplanes and what is actually going on with them. It got me almost, but not quite, interested enough to want to go flying in a small plane to see how it works “in the air.” All of this is very interesting, and important, from the perspective of my profession as a System Safety Engineer. It is often critically important that there is an alignment (consilience?) between what is happening within the mental model developed in the mind of a machine operator and what is actually happening with the machine. Even small differences can quickly lead to disaster.

How do we model what we see?

I have been enjoying a book by Edward O. Wilson, “Consilience the unity of knowledge.” In this book, Dr. Wilson explores some really interesting ideas about how we think, and how that might be a reflection of how we are put together biologically as the result of evolutionary pressures. One of the topics of interest to me is a discussion that perhaps art is in alignment with our biology as evidenced by the presence of certain archetypes and techniques in art that seem to have been common across cultures for tens of thousands of years. There are certain things about “art” that “feel” compelling and connect us to emotional stirrings.

As I was contemplating that I started to wonder, based upon not a lot more than idle musings, if perhaps we automatically build mental models of the world around us that as similar to three dimensional wire models that are the basis of cad drawing packages on drafting computers. When I try to sketch something, perhaps a building or a table, I automatically do so by drawing lines representing the edges of things. I did this for perhaps fifty years before it finally dawned on me that there are no lines in the real world. Somehow I thought I was “tracing” actual lines located along the edges of things. Obviously there are just changes in color, shading, texture and things like that – but there are no lines. However, even with that rudimentary (and rather obvious) insight, it still feels compelling to me that I am somehow drawing lines where there are lines. Maybe, but I might be wrong here, there ARE lines, but they are embedded in the way my brain simplifies, stores and manipulates our perception of the world. Maybe we somehow map the edges as lines, that can then be shifted, manipulated, rotated and simplified in our “mind’s eye.”

I surprised myself a few years ago while sitting under the shade of a tree sketching the great pyramid chicen itza. I was sitting on the ground level with the base of the pyramid, trying my best to accurately represent what I was seeing. I wasn’t trying to be “artsy” by drawing an impossible representation, I was paying attention to angles, perspective, shadows, and all that in an attempt to draw what I was seeing. When I finished my drawing I was kind of pleased with the effort, it looked very much like what I as seeing – but … oops, it was drawn from a position several hundred feet in the air, far above my head.

The really amazing part of this was that I hadn’t noticed the rather dramatic error while making the drawing. I thought I was following what I was seeing, but rather obviously I was doing something quite different, I was somehow or another following what I was seeing in my “minds eye” – but not in my physical eye.

The amazing thing was that I could have drawn it from many different angles without having to move to a new location, some how or another I already knew what it looked like from different directions.

An interesting side to this is that many of the great masters started their drawings with pencil sketches consisting of lines indicating the location of edges. They then paint over their lines, hiding them from view as they fill in the spaces between the lines – perhaps somewhere in the physical architecture of our brain a “wire frame” representation exists. From an evolutionary point of view that would be a very efficient means for modeling, remembering, and “imagining” the physical space we live within.

There is nothing of particular value here, I am just pondering the distinction between what we see and what we “see”. It is clear that “real” light particles hit our eye. (Whatever that might mean from the point of view of modern physics.) These light “particles” influence chemical processes in our nerves that transmit coded information to our brain. Our brain takes those nerve impulses and somehow builds a “mental model” (that is very similar to a dream) – and that mental model is actually what we “perceive.” We don’t actually see anything, we only “see” what has been created by our brain and nerves after a whole lot of filtering, processing, filling in details, and other adjustments have been made. I have always been curious about what we are adding on our own, and what we are filtering out (removing) that is actually there.